Not a day passes that make headlines in the newspapers and news value of the GDP (Gross Domestic Product http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodotto_interno_lordo ): lost three points, two earned, China's GDP grew by 9%. And all of us to say: "Ah, see? With GDP this we understand that we are in full recovery " in the event of an increase, while in the event of a fall" Damn, if it continues to fall so we're going to ruin . The important is, however, while expressing those views, not stop buying useless products, pollutants that drain the resources of the planet, maybe that exploit child labor, which in most cases appear to be mere duplication of objects that we already fully functional. Some examples: phones, I-Pad, TV sets, fashionable tennis shoes (the fashion of those?) Appliances unknown utility that regularly end up in the cellars and then, after appropriate mea culpa, to grease the landfill. Not to mention the drugs: a real disaster. invented diseases, symptoms of diseases known suddenly expanded, psychosis generated by personal alarm foundation, massive sponsorship of products against itching of various nature and location (usually when you have an itch you scratch and then pass). And the city, which has taken no coincidence that the name of the consumer, it moves on the edge of GDP with a constant voltage towards the object of "next generation " and unless you can afford it, or until we get into debt ' bone or falls into depression, frustration from lack of prey. In fact the only real economic crisis is responsible for him, the consumer, that is responsible for maintenance of the economy and to do this certainly can not keep the same phone for more than 10-12 months, if the last season were cigarette jeans, worry that this year's touches the elephant's leg and so on.
and unemployment? (News of the day: by 2010 more redundant new recruits) Always blame the consumer because he failed to (and overwhelmed by funding debit cards) to purchase the buffalo round, launched in the market through advertising millionaire . If we figure coincides with that of the consumer or worker cassintegrati / unemployed, it is only incidental. If you spend all the salary and even more, it guarantees the work. Otherwise authorized! I
realize that the issue is extremely complex, it is a flaw that appears unsolvable, the enlightened minds of the economy if they carefully keep their distance. Yet the route can be reversed in our daily starting from small things, requires two essential conditions: a low effort and a massive number of people. The enormous power of the consumer is aware can control the market and expect greater value for money by simply making the right choices, going to reward those who produce the good at the right cost and boycotting those who point to gain propina wild and shoddy products. It's a matter of discernment, which is based on simple assessments:
1 - what I really need that product (always taking into account the impact on health and environment)?
2 - who makes it to the highest quality standards and does not use misleading advertising?
answering these questions could guide our choices and establish a new healthier development of demand and market supply.
